Motorola Phone Tools 4.2.1.a.

The thought of thinking and thinking.

The Relevance of Gentile.

"the reality is unthinkable except in relation coll'attività thinking that is unthinkable"

It follows that thinking is essentially a distinction between activities and abstract thinking and concrete thinking, thinking thinking, not being act, is abstract. concrete thinking is the thinking in place.

Some thoughts.

thinking in action is my ego, is self-consciousness of 'I existing ego subject, I think therefore I am, is the true reality, not reality mediated by the senses, as Schopenhauer says, is a concrete thought , a real thought and thought can be summarized in the act of thinking, being, reality, subject and object. The act of thinking is a dynamic and therefore the transitional decade in thinking that thought is abstract and static.

But the thought thought where does it go? To answer

this question, must be sought in biological science: the thought thought up by the brain is collected in LTM (long-term memory). Exemplifying with hardware terminology, we can say of thinking and that thought is the ram on 'hard disk. It often happens to reopen old files, that is designed to resume thoughts that are in the MLT and from this moment, the thought back thought to be in place and then thought it is still thought to create such a loop, rather than a dialectic between thinking and thought .

Falling from the 'supercelestial "pure thought to the empirical world of MLT is a looming problem does not matter: who assures us that information, stored in it, have not deteriorated like an old floppy?

thought thought brought to light is the original or a copy of it faded and display errors?

If we think that damage to the hippocampus, (MP all'encoding of new memories), with the cortical areas close to it and cause amnesia when we consider that there is a branch of physics that studies the Theory of Errors, (it is a part pretty boring, so I avoid going into detail, but basically, in short, says that each measurement or reading to a certain error, which may be due to the instrument with which you are measuring, bias, or due to the operator, random error), whatever, I'm afraid I have to answer that in many cases, the reading of thoughts fedelmante thought does not correspond to 'the original.

In light of these considerations, I think the current concept of Gentile is fairly centered.

Nothing exists except act in which it is thought.

And I would add: there is nothing concrete, that is really true, if not in the act in which it is thought, everything else is an approximation.

So there is a bug creeping relativism of jeopardizing our res cogitans?

Marcello

Why