From the Giornale del 04/30/2009
Daniele Abbiati
"" The best compliment that of Nietzsche (but not to Nietzsche) is Georg Simmel and is dated October 23, 1897. "There is nothing easier than" refute "Nietzsche. The metamorphosis speculative leaps in its development, the violent fantasies that he applies the story, the logical contradictions of his world view are so obvious as to ensure that the scientific issue against him can not all be to demonstrate his errors, but to explain why, despite these errors, he was able to elicit such profound impression not only among those who are fond of the literary fashions or love the beautiful shape. "
The strength of the author would be to charm rather than "literary" of his work, in spite of his being a philosopher himself. The account appears in the review essay by Ferdinand Tönnies The cult of Nietzsche. In fact, a true "cult" had blossomed throughout Europe, around the devastated poor body and mind of the father of Superman who died there in three years. With the catastrophe in Turin in January 1888 was the curtain fell on the person of Nietzsche, but he had raised another, much heavier, on Nietzsche's master-guru. "Psychopathological phenomenon," "bourgeois," "aristocratic," "theory of capitalism ',' social democratic ',' anarchist ',' evolutionary 'labels applicategli within five to six years are many, and all wrong to some extent, extensions.
And still on the corpus of Nietzsche's still the stigma of those and other misappropriations. Revised e. .. sister Elisabeth in the wrong key material (and ethically) proactive and reactionary, Our endured the Nazi Anschluss by the delusion that if a medal pinned to his chest as intellectual, ignoring or pretending to ignore, among other things, repeatedly stated his anti-Semitism. Filtered by the pre-and post-twentieth-century disasters Third Reich, Nietzsche's nihilistic ectoplasm remained only recently been criticized papal, while his aesthetic, his humanism, his enlightenment are confined specialized studies in the closet of ... ... ""
do not agree in considering that of Georg Simmel a compliment, let alone that "there is nothing easier than" refute "Nietzsche".
Nietzsche is not to be refuted, but it is Nietzsche himself who rejects everything and everyone.
It 'clear that Simmel, being the predominant sociological interest in him, can not, despite having undergone a certain charm, share the philosophy of Nietzsche.
I'm sorry that you incur more error to consider Nietzsche an anti-Semite, in the sense of racism. Our anti-Semitic as anti-Christian, as anti-metaphysical, as anticredente: in essence, is against everything that is represented by 5000 years of man-made superstructures. Nihilism of Our
not an end in itself, destroyed everything to start a new era for the Man, how can we call a nihilist who constantly invokes the will to power?
God is dead, but the man died waiting for the man transvaluation: the superman or maybe it's better to say 's "Superman." Any attempt to subdue, as has been done, new philosophical, political or social does not do justice to his thought, certainly in the original history of philosophy.
Marcello
0 comments:
Post a Comment