I refer to the thinking of these famous people, especially trying to interpret the thought of Hegel.
"Do not be surprised if the Saracens hate Christians: it is because the law that has cursed their prophet Muhammad ordered him to do all the evil that can people who do not follow their faith, and to take all they can take: for them is not a sin. And if Christians are to kill or do anything wrong, they consider them their brothers of the martyrs (...). All the Saracens in the world behave the same way " Marco Polo, 1271.
"In the Qur'an we find the most squalid and poorest of theism. Let us admit that much has been lost in translation, but in this I was not able to find even a thought has value. " Arthur Schopenhauer. The World as Will and Representation (1819).
"Abstraction dominated the Mohammedans, and their aim was to give precedence to the cult of abstract, and there tended with the greatest enthusiasm. This enthusiasm was fanaticism, that enthusiasm for abstraction, for an abstract idea, which has a negative attitude with respect to the existing " Friedrich Hegel, 1837
Marco Polo, pragmatic businessman and keen observer of the customs of the peoples, although some resentment against Islam, such as Venice was bringing this has centered perfectly on the point.
Islam is unchangeable, from 'hijra to date has not changed one iota, abuse of power, conquest, violence, annihilation of man and especially of women. Many suras of the Quran begins with the words "In the name of Allah, the Beneficent, the Merciful," but if you do not obey his wishes and do not convert infidel is right for you to die and in the worst way, not to mention the fate of those that "stain" of the sin of apostasy. The Judgement of Schopenhauer
Islam is lapidary and not open to question: the Koran has no intellectual value.
Hegel's position, although it certainly negative, enables us to expand in another field that of fanaticism.
Fanaticism has always been the scourge of mankind and not just about Islam and other religions atheism, but all ideologies in general.
We experienced dramatically in the last century, communism and Nazism at all. Fanaticism leads to annihilation of man, to give up a independent thought to blend into formless mass of "subjects", well handled by some, who call themselves the voice of God or the bearers of universal good. Classical aesthetic manifestation of bigotry, are the Roman salute, a clenched fist and how to pray for Muslims.
This brings the enthusiasm for an 'abstract idea and, according to Hegel, an abstract idea has "a negative attitude with respect to the existing."
Existence, therefore, has a its autonomous function, hence the devaluation of the intrinsic values \u200b\u200bsuch as freedom of human thought. It 's the declassification of man to a mere instrument, an end to the most abstract and difficult to understand, but must be followed, Marxist talking to the reification of man. This is Islam, in one aspect of spirituality, only the fanaticism that subjugates man to take him to the contempt for life, either their own or other people's, namely the culture of death. I believe that those who have watched TV in the statements of the bomber is impressed, but the statements of the mothers of these children are even hallucinating. This can only be explained as Schopenhauer writes, with the most squalid and poorest of theism. No
Islam.
"Do not be surprised if the Saracens hate Christians: it is because the law that has cursed their prophet Muhammad ordered him to do all the evil that can people who do not follow their faith, and to take all they can take: for them is not a sin. And if Christians are to kill or do anything wrong, they consider them their brothers of the martyrs (...). All the Saracens in the world behave the same way " Marco Polo, 1271.
"In the Qur'an we find the most squalid and poorest of theism. Let us admit that much has been lost in translation, but in this I was not able to find even a thought has value. " Arthur Schopenhauer. The World as Will and Representation (1819).
"Abstraction dominated the Mohammedans, and their aim was to give precedence to the cult of abstract, and there tended with the greatest enthusiasm. This enthusiasm was fanaticism, that enthusiasm for abstraction, for an abstract idea, which has a negative attitude with respect to the existing " Friedrich Hegel, 1837
Marco Polo, pragmatic businessman and keen observer of the customs of the peoples, although some resentment against Islam, such as Venice was bringing this has centered perfectly on the point.
Islam is unchangeable, from 'hijra to date has not changed one iota, abuse of power, conquest, violence, annihilation of man and especially of women. Many suras of the Quran begins with the words "In the name of Allah, the Beneficent, the Merciful," but if you do not obey his wishes and do not convert infidel is right for you to die and in the worst way, not to mention the fate of those that "stain" of the sin of apostasy. The Judgement of Schopenhauer
Islam is lapidary and not open to question: the Koran has no intellectual value.
Hegel's position, although it certainly negative, enables us to expand in another field that of fanaticism.
Fanaticism has always been the scourge of mankind and not just about Islam and other religions atheism, but all ideologies in general.
We experienced dramatically in the last century, communism and Nazism at all. Fanaticism leads to annihilation of man, to give up a independent thought to blend into formless mass of "subjects", well handled by some, who call themselves the voice of God or the bearers of universal good. Classical aesthetic manifestation of bigotry, are the Roman salute, a clenched fist and how to pray for Muslims.
This brings the enthusiasm for an 'abstract idea and, according to Hegel, an abstract idea has "a negative attitude with respect to the existing."
Existence, therefore, has a its autonomous function, hence the devaluation of the intrinsic values \u200b\u200bsuch as freedom of human thought. It 's the declassification of man to a mere instrument, an end to the most abstract and difficult to understand, but must be followed, Marxist talking to the reification of man. This is Islam, in one aspect of spirituality, only the fanaticism that subjugates man to take him to the contempt for life, either their own or other people's, namely the culture of death. I believe that those who have watched TV in the statements of the bomber is impressed, but the statements of the mothers of these children are even hallucinating. This can only be explained as Schopenhauer writes, with the most squalid and poorest of theism. No
Islam.
